Wagatha Christie

Defamation: reflecting on the ‘Wagatha Christie’ story

26/11/2024

Over the last week, discussions surrounding the Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy case have been resurrected, with Coleen’s appearance on the popular ITV programme, I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here

In 2019, Coleen published a social media post alleging that Rebekah Vardy had sold false stories about her to the press. Rebekah denied the claims and commenced proceedings for libel but lost the case against Coleen in 2022.

What is Defamation?

Defamatory words are those which tend to lower the victim in the estimation of right -thinking members of society generally.  Defamation occurs when false statements, spoken or published, harm an individual’s or an entity’s reputation.

Legal Tests to bring a successful defamation claim

In order to prove defamation, Rebekah Vardy needed to demonstrate the following elements:

  • False Statement: The statement must be false and presented as a fact rather than an opinion.
  • Publication: The false statement must be communicated to a third party, either in written, spoken, or published form.
  • Identification: The statement must identify the individual or business clearly.
  • Harm: The false statement must have caused harm to the individual or business’s reputation, resulting in quantifiable damages.

The defence of Truth 

Section 2(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 provides there is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the statement complained of is substantially true. Truth is an absolute defence to a defamation claim, as a claimant should not be entitled to recover damages for injury to a reputation they did not deserve to have in the first place.

In defamation claims, there is a legal presumption in favour of the claimant that a defamatory statement is false, meaning that the burden of proof reverses and in the Vardy v Rooney example, it was for Coleen Rooney to prove that her words were substantially true.

The judge ruled that Rebekah Vardy was, in fact, actively engaged in the leaks from various social media platforms, and as truth is an absolute defence to a defamation claim, the judge’s finding meant that Rebekah Vardy’s claim was dismissed in its entirety, and she has had to pay substantial costs.

How Pinney Talfourd can help

Defamation poses a substantial threat to both individual and business reputation, revenue, and relationships. At Pinney Talfourd LLP, we are dedicated to safeguarding our clients’ interests by providing expert legal guidance in navigating the intricacies of defamation law.

The above is meant to be only advice and is correct as of the time of posting. This article was written by Emma Hardie, CILEX Lawyer in the Commercial Litigation Team at Pinney Talfourd LLP Solicitors. The contents of this article are for the purposes of general awareness only. They do not purport to constitute legal or professional advice. Specific legal advice should be taken on each individual matter. This article is based on the law as of November 2024.

26/11/2024

Authors

Emma Rayner

Emma Hardie

CILEX Lawyer

Popular Insights

Footer bg

Would you like to know more?

For help and advice, talk to a member of our team. They can advise on the best options in your matter.

Call: 01708 229 444 Email us

TrustPilot Widget - Pinney Talfourd Solicitors
VISA
Mastercard
Maestro
JCB

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal services that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

    Download    Add to portfolio   
    Portfolio
    TitleTypeCVEmail

    Remove All

    Download


    Click here to share this shortlist.
    (It will expire after 30 days.)